United States of America v. Graham et al
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Delta Funding Corporation, Ann Cecilia Graham, Elena S. Graham, Roberto S. Graham and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Case Number:
1:2013cv01288
Filed:
March 12, 2013
Court:
New York Eastern District Court
Office:
Brooklyn Office
Referring Judge:
Vera M. Scanlon
Presiding Judge:
William F. Kuntz
Nature of Suit:
Taxes
Cause of Action:
26:7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| March 6, 2015 | 48 |
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, on the basis of the record and law as set forth above, the Government's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as it relates to all tax assessments other than the tax assessment for the tax period ending Septem ber 30, 2002. The Government's motion for Summary Judgment is also GRANTED as it relates to Roberto's interest as a tenant by the entirety in the 96th Street Property. The Government's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as it relate s to the tax assessment for the tax period ending September 30, 2002. The Government's motion for Summary Judgment is also DENIED as it relates to Roberto's interest in the Wyona Property. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/5/2015. (Brucella, Michelle)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
