Stankovic v. Nys Higher Education Services et al
Plaintiff: Snezana Stankovic
Defendant: Nys Higher Education Services and U.S. Education Dept.
Collection Agency: Pioneer Credit Recovery
Case Number: 1:2013cv01467
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting (7) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:13-cv-01467-DLI-RER; granting (2) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:13-cv-01854-DLI-RER -- For purposes of this Order only, pro se plaint iff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP")in each of these cases are granted. However, for the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, both of these actions are DISMISSED, with prejudice. More over, it is evident that Plaintiff has not taken the Court's warning regarding filing repetitive and frivolous complaints seriously. Plaintiff's further filing of redundant and baseless IFP complaints shall not be tolerated by this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby directed to show cause, by written affirmation, TO BE FILED NO LATER THAN MAY 30, 2013, why Plaintiff should not be barred from filing any future IFP complaints without first obtaining leave of the Court to do so. If Plaintiff fails to show good cause within the time allotted, she will be barred from filing any future IFP complaint without first obtaining leave of the Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this O rder would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Summary Order to pro se plaintiff and to close both cases under docket numbers 13-cv-1467 and 13-cv-1854. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/29/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stankovic v. Nys Higher Education Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nys Higher Education Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Education Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Snezana Stankovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Collection agency: Pioneer Credit Recovery
Represented By: Devin Roger Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?