Gesualdi et al v. Dan Yant Inc.
| Frank H. Finkel, Louis Bisignano, Thomas F. Corbett, Joseph A. Ferrara, Sr., Anthony D'Aquila, Thomas Gesualdi, Marc Herbst, Michael O'Toole, Denise Richardson and Benny Umbra |
| Dan Yant Inc. |
| 1:2013cv01872 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court hereby affirms and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court. Accordingly, judgment should be entered for plaintiffs and against defendant Dan Yant Inc. as follows: $2 ,418.28 in unpaid contributions, $1,300.00 in audit fees, $3,313.64 in attorney's fees and costs, prejudgment interest from September 1, 2008 to the entry of judgment that is to be calculated upon entry of judgment by the clerk of cour t using the formulas and figures provided by Magistrate Judge Mann on pages 11-12 of the R&R, and liquidated damages in an amount equal to the amount of prejudgment interest. The clerk of court is further respectfully requested to mail a copy of the judgment and this Order to defendant, note service on the docket, and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/19/2014. (Raghunathan, Abhishek)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
