Illinois Union Insurance Company v. Midwood Lumber & Millwork, Inc. et al
Illinois Union Insurance Company |
231 Carlton Avenue, LLC, Albanna Engineering, P.C., Boro Architects, LLC, Intergrity Consulting Services, Inc., Kings Material Co., Inc.,, Clayton Laboard, Midwood Lumber & Millwork, Inc., Professional Grade Construction Group , Inc., Ignatius Regis, S&B Masonary Corp. and Deanna Rose Simms |
1:2013cv02466 |
April 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
James Orenstein |
Allyne R. Ross |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 135 Illinois Union's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 145 Midwood's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 148 All Risk's Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons se t forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Illinois Union's motion for summary judgment and denies the cross-motions by Midwood and All Risk. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/30/2016. (Reyneri, Rafael) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached opinion and order. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 2/18/2014. (Frey, Laurie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.