Mallgren v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Mallgren v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

Mallgren v. Sprint Nextel Corporation

Plaintiff:	Anthony Brian Mallgren
Defendant:	Sprint Nextel Corporation
Case Number:	1:2013cv02477
Filed:	April 23, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Margo K. Brodie
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2014	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Fede ral Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court renews its warning to Plaintiff that the future filing of vexatious and frivolous litigation may result in sanctions, including the imposition of an injunction prohibiting him from making future filings seek ing in forma pauperis status without leave of the Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 3/12/2014. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2014

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Fede ral Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court renews its warning to Plaintiff that the future filing of vexatious and frivolous litigation may result in sanctions, including the imposition of an injunction prohibiting him from making future filings seek ing in forma pauperis status without leave of the Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 3/12/2014. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mallgren v. Sprint Nextel Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Brian Mallgren
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Nextel Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?