Brown v. New York City Board of Elections et al
| Everly D. Brown |
| New York City Board of Elections, Richard Brown, Jose Miguel Araujo, New York State Attorney General, Juan Carlos Polanco and Steven H. Richman |
| 1:2013cv02729 |
| May 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT: Excluded for a place on the ballot in 2011, plaintiff, prose, alleges that the requirements to run for District Attorney in Queens County violate both the New York State Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. He see ks declaratory judgment and damages. Defendants move to dismiss on the merits and for failure to prosecute. On two occasions on which this motion to dismiss on the merits was to be heard, plaintiff failed to appear. The case is not mooted because th e issue may arise again and again. See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 (1974) (finding that challenges to election laws may avoid mootness because they are "capable of repetition, yet evading review"). The case is dismissed. No costs or disbursements are awarded. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 12/2/2013. (Barrett, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
