Allah v. Cunningham

Allah v. Cunningham

Petitioner:	Infinite Allah
Respondent:	Robert Cunningham
Case Number:	1:2013cv02805
Filed:	May 9, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Kiyo A. Matsumoto
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2016	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons discussed in the annexed opinion, this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed in its entirety as time-barred. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent , close this case, and serve a copy of this order on the pro se petitioner at his last known address. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability will not issue because petitioner has not made a "substantial showing" of a denial of a constitutional right. Petitioner has a right to seek a certificate of appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/27/2016. (Jacobson, Jonathan)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2016

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. For the reasons discussed in the annexed opinion, this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed in its entirety as time-barred. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of respondent , close this case, and serve a copy of this order on the pro se petitioner at his last known address. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability will not issue because petitioner has not made a "substantial showing" of a denial of a constitutional right. Petitioner has a right to seek a certificate of appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/27/2016. (Jacobson, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allah v. Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Infinite Allah
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?