El-Bey v. Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al et al
| Stanley Aristilde El-Bey |
| Badge #667 Lee, Badge #3238 Lee, Badge #18828 Delmoral, Badge #18771 Debois, Badge #18403 Motsiff, Badge #17112 Vidal, Badge #16130 Harris, Badge #14721 Solomon, Badge #13344 ORR, Badge #10720 John, Badge # McQueen, Badge # 860 Fulton, Badge # 15750, Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al, Badge #8092, Kush Greene, Lt. Paul Hogan and SGT Costello |
| Janet Runcie |
| 1:2013cv02956 |
| May 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Both actions are dismissed with prejudice. The motion for recusal is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close both cases. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/17/2013. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff did file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis, listing his wages and assets as "0," responding to additional questions with an "X," and printing his name, but not signing the req uired declaration. Despite these deficiencies in plaintiff's 5 application, the Court hereby grants the request to proceed in forma pauperis solely for purposes of this Order. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudic e. Should plaintiff wish to amend the complaint, the Court directs plaintiff to submit an amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this Order. Failure to comply with the deadline will result in dismissal with prejudice. Once submitted, th e amended complaint will be reviewed for compliance with this Order and for sufficiency under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 6/27/2013. C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Since plaintiff refuses to disclose any financial information, the court does not have the information it needs in order to make a finding of indigence and waive the filing fee. Thus, the Court declines to grant in forma pauperis status at this time. The Court directs plaintiff to submit an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee to the Clerk of Court within 14 days from the date of this Order. In the alternative, plaintiff may withdraw this action by informing the court in writing within 14 days. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the action shall be dismissed. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appea l from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 5/22/2013. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
