Wright-Upshaw v. Nelson et al
| Faye Wright-Upshaw |
| Crystal Nixon, Ronald L. Nelson, Lisa Larion, Joseph Fineo, Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC, Josephine C. Adams and Margaret Warner |
| 1:2013cv03367 |
| June 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. Plaintiff lacks standing to pursue claims for A New New Beginning's expenses and lost income. To the extent that plaintiff's complaint can be construed to raise i ndividual claims of emotional distress or racial discrimination, plaintiff's own version of events establishes that she is not entitled to relief on those grounds. The Court therefore finds it unnecessary to address defendants' remaining grounds for dismissal, including lack of personal jurisdiction, improper service, failure to allege a basis for individual liability against various defendants, or failure to allege a contractual, tort, or statutory duty owed to plaintiff. The comp laint is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 2/19/2014. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
