Cadle Company v. Livingston et al
| Cadle Company |
| Kathleen Wilson and Eldridge Livingston |
| 1:2013cv03799 |
| July 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. As set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Azrack's unopposed 21 report and recommendation and adopts Judge Azrack's recommendation, as modified, pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), for entry of judgment against Livingston in the following amounts: (1) $121,349.09 in principal, (2) $93,770.82 in interest through October 15, 2013, (3) $559.90 in costs and disbursement, (4) $ ;7,039.25 in prejudgment interest for the period between October 15, 2013 and the date of this Memorandum and Order, and (5) additional interest at the rate of $34.05 per day from May 8, 2014 through the date of judgment. The Court adopts Judge Azrack's recommendation for entry of judgment against Wilson in the amount of $197,000. Livingston and Wilson are jointly and severally liable for the amount of $197,000. Livingston is solely liable for the additional amount of $25,719.06, plus prejudgment interest from May 9, 2014 through the date of judgment. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/9/2014. (Prakash, Swati)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
