Hamilton v. Lee
| Rohan Hamilton |
| William Lee |
| 1:2013cv04336 |
| July 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying petitioner's 92 Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from this court's March 27, 2015 judgment denying his writ of habeas corpus. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 5/26/2016. (Barrett, C)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Petitioner Rohan Hamilton brings a Rule 60(b) motion requesting relief from this court's judgment of March 27, 2015 which denied his habeas corpus petition. (ECF Nos. 73 , 92 .) Due to the unusual circumsta nces of this case and the desirability of developing a complete factual record for the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the court determines that petitioner's claims relating to the newly available duct tape evidence are properly raise d in the context of a Rule 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition. Given the apparently negative results of the examination of the now available tape conducted by petitioner's expert, an evidentiary hearin g will be conducted on November 19, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. Both parties are directed to appear with qualified appropriate experts prepared to address, among other relevant issues: (1) why the latent print previously identified by the NYPD on the duct tape appears to no longer be visible; (2) what kind of further examination, if any, could be carried out to determine whether there is, or was, a print on any part of available duct tape; and (3) any other issues raised by the parties. (Evidentiary Hearing set for 11/19/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10B South before Judge Jack B. Weinstein.) Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 10/10/2015. (Barrett, C)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER reducing amount of expert voucher. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 10/5/2015. (Gold, Steven)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The 63 motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(i) is denied. The motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(vi) is denied. The petition for a w rit of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2554 is denied. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The New York City Police Department is under a continuing obligation to produce the duct tape, and to expedite that production to t he extent possible. This issue is respectfully referred to the magistrate judge for decision. This referral is not intended by the court to affect the finality of this judgment of dismissal and certification. This court does not make a finding on finality. A certificate of appealability is granted with respect to: (1) petitioner's right to confrontation; and (2) whether defense counsel provided a constitutionally adequate defense with respect to the issue of the duct tape, and whether a different defense would have changed the verdict. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 3/27/2015. (Barrett, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hamilton v. Lee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rohan Hamilton | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Mark Stern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: William Lee | |
| Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
