Federal Express Corporation v. Jetex Management Services, Inc. et al
| Federal Express Corporation |
| Jetex Management Services, Inc. and Jetex Express Inc. |
| 1:2013cv04431 |
| August 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the record and, finding no clear error, hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Reyes's R&R as the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, the Court permanently enjoins defendants JetEx Management Services, Inc. and JetEx Express, Inc., their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries and related companies, and all persons acting for, with, by, through or under them having notice of this Order (see order); Defendants shall file with the Court and serve on FedEx, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of final judgment, a report in writing and under oath detailing the manner in which they have complied with all terms of the permanent i njunction. Moreover, the Court awards FedEx $4,174.99 in attorney's fees and $825.01 in costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/12/2014. c/m to defts (fwd for jgm) (Fernandez, Erica)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
