Raffaele v. City of New York et al
| Thomas D. Raffaele |
| Richard A. Brown, City of New York, Peter A. Crusco, Jane and John Doe 1-20, Raymond W. Kelly, Richard Lee, New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board, Daniel O'Leary and Jon-Kristian Rzonca |
| 1:2013cv04607 |
| August 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court grants the moving defendants motion to dismiss 56 in its entirety and plaintiffs following claims are hereby dismissed: (1) conspiracy claims pursuant to §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (Counts I, V, VI, VII and VIII); (2) denial of access claim pursuant to § 1983 (Count IV); (3) supervisory liability claim against Commissioner Kelley (Count IX); (4) municipal liability claim (Count X); (5) pri ma facie tort claim (Count XII); (6) slander and libel claims(Counts XIII and XV); and (7) all claims against the District Attorney defendants. In the absence of any request or proposals by plaintiff, the court denies leave to amend at this time. If plaintiff intends to amend his complaint, he must make his request including his proposed amendments within 14 days of entry of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 10/30/2015. (Gong, LiJia)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER re 54 First MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal filed by Thomas D. Raffaele. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the motion to file plaintiff's memorandum of law in opposition to defendants&# 039; motion to dismiss, as well as the attached CCRB report, under seal is denied. Plaintiffs counsel should confer with counsel for the City defendants to determine whether any particular information should be redacted for privacy purposes, and, no later than June 17, 2014, plaintiff should file an unsealed version of the memorandum of law and the CCRB report. In addition, any portions of the report that are immaterial to the motion need not be resubmitted to the court. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 6/9/2014. (Keefe, Reed)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
