Muss Development, LLC et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Flushing Town Center III, L.P., Muss Development, LLC and Tishman Construction Corp. of New York
Defendant: Nationwide Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2013cv04848
Filed: August 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: After considering the parties' 43 47 and 49 motions for summary and declaratory judgment regarding the coverage owed under the Illinois National OCIP and the Nationwide Policy, in connection with the underlying bod ily injury action, the Court rules as follows: (1) Urban is not entitled to coverage under the Illinois National OCIP; (2) the Court declines to make a declaration as to Flushing, Muss, and Tishman's coverage under the Illinois National OCIP, as this coverage is not contested and a declaration of such coverage is not necessary to a determination of the parties' rights under the Nationwide Policy; (3) questions of material fact preclude the Court from determining whether Flushing is entitled to additional insured coverage under the Nationwide Policy at this stage; (4) Muss is entitled to additional insured coverage under the Nationwide Policy and the coverage provided under the Nationwide Policy is primary and must be exha usted before the excess coverage provided under the Illinois National OCIP becomes effective; and (5) Tishman is not entitled to additional insured coverage under the Nationwide Policy, because Tishman lacks privity of contract with Urban. The question of Nationwide's duty to indemnify cannot be resolved without a determination of liability in the underlying bodily injury action. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 10/20/2015. (Chee, Alvin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muss Development, LLC et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Flushing Town Center III, L.P.
Represented By: Jennifer Rachel Budoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muss Development, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer Rachel Budoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tishman Construction Corp. of New York
Represented By: Jennifer Rachel Budoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Insurance Company
Represented By: Thomas J. Bracken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?