People of the State of New York v. Posr et al
People of the State of New York |
Posr A. Posr and Kris Gounden |
1:2013cv05143 |
September 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER finding as moot 6 Motion for Writ of Mandamus AND DISMISSING CASE - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, this action is dismissed in its entirety. As Posr and Gounden have not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good fa ith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Writt en Summary order to pro se plaintiffs, correct the caption to reflect that the People of the State of New York are defendants, not plaintiffs, and POSR. A. POSR and KRIS GOUNDEN are the named plaintiffs, not defendants, and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/25/2014. (Irizarry, Dora) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.