Tuhin v. New York Motor Group LLC et al
| Shahadat H. Tuhin |
| Mamdoh Eltouby, Jane Doe identified as "Nada", John Doe identified as "Dewan", John Doe identified as "John/Jay/Julio", John/Jane Does, M&T Bank Corporation and New York Motor Group LLC |
| 1:2013cv05643 |
| October 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 53 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 60 Cross Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim against related plaintiffs filed by M&T Bank Corporation ( Objecti ons to R&R due by 6/22/2015). More specifically, plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaints is granted except with respect to those claims I recommend be dismissed. I respectfully recommend that defendants' motions to dismiss be denied, except that the following claims be dismissed: 1) Plaintiffs' RICO claims against M&T Bank; 2) Plaintiffs' TILA claims for damages (but not rescission) against M&T Bank; 3) Plaintiff Tuhin's Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim; and 4) Plaintiffs' New York General Business Law claims against M&T Bank. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/3/2015. (Jason, Kevin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
