Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co., Ltd. v. Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corporation et al
| Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co., Ltd. |
| Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corporation, Aceco, Inc., David Liu and Chang-Zhu Yu |
| 1:2013cv05829 |
| October 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: Pursuant to the annexed Order, Plaintiff Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co., Ltd. may pierce the corporate veil, and hold individual Defendants David Z. Liu and Chan-Zhu Yu personally liable for the judgment against Defendants Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corporation and Aceco, Inc. in the amount of $1,977,642.02. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter judgment for Plaintiff and close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/30/2017. (Feldman, Shira)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts the 57 August 21, 2014 report and recommendations of Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. The Court grants the 34 motion to vacate the Order of Attachment. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 11/7/2014. (Krause, Aimee)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts the 56 August 7, 2014 report and recommendations of Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. The Court (1) grants Rockaway's motion to vacate the attachment of 25 Gracewood Drive, Manhasset, New York, and (2) denies the motion for Rule 11 sanctions. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/20/2014. (Krause, Aimee)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: (1) recommending that the 44 motion to vacate the attachment of 25 Gracewood Drive, Manhasset, New York be granted; (2) recommending that the motion for Rule 11 sanctions be denied; (3) granting in part and denying in part the motion to quash the subpoena served on China Citic Bank; and (4) denying the motion to compel the plaintiff to attend a conference. See annexed Opinion for details. The deadline for filing objections to the Report and Recommendations made in the Opinion is August 21, 2014. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 8/7/2014. (Pohorelsky, Viktor)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
