Weber v. The Resource Training Center, Inc. et al
| Michelle Weber |
| Michael Buckley, Donna Mae Depola, Maria Mendez, Dona Pagan and The Resource Training Center, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv06480 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER granting 123 Motion to Compel for the reasons and to the extent indicated in the attached Order. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 9/21/2015. (Gold, Steven)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER re 93 Letter filed by Michelle Weber. Plaintiff's request to serve the non-party witnesses by first-class mail is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this Order. The Court approves of the text of the cover letter plaintiff proposes to include with the subpoenas. The original subpoenas "so ordered" by the Court are available from my chambers at counsel's convenience. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 4/8/2015. (Schlacter, Meredith)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 65 Motion to Quash; denying 69 Motion for Discovery; denying 70 Motion for Discovery, subject to the contingency set forth in the attached order. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 12/23/2014. (Gold, Steven)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
