Clemmons v. Holder et al
Joan E Clemmons |
Robert L Butler, Leroy C. Clemons, Eric H. Holder, Loreta E. Lynch and Albert R. Mann |
1:2013cv07229 |
December 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Robert M. Levy |
Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 For the reasons stated in the MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Federal Defendants motion to dismiss is granted, and the court dismisses the Complaint against all Defendants in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment pursuant to the Memorandum and Order, serve plaintiff with a copy of the Memorandum and Order and Judgment, note service on the docket, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 8/17/2015. (Gong, LiJia) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: By motion dated 1/22/2014 and docketed 7/27/2014, pro se plaintiff Joan E. Clemmons ("plaintiff") submitted a motion for the recusal of the Honorable Robert M. Levy and objections to a 1/8/2014 Order issued b y Judge Levy. Plaintiff's 4 motion is denied in its entirety, and Judge Levy's 3 Order of 1/8/2014 is affirmed. The Clerk of Court is requested to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address listed on the docket sheet and to note service on the docket. SO ORDERED by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto, on 2/3/2014. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.