Paige-Bey v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Zaire Paige-Bey
Defendant: Darren Albanese, Michael Bloomberg, City of New York, District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, Raymond Kelly, Officer Rashan LaCoste and Police Officer David Lawrence
Case Number: 1:2013cv07300
Filed: December 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Sandra L. Townes
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' third motion for summary judgment. Defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to the malicious prosecution claim against Lawrence is granted. Defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to the malicious prosecution claim against LaCoste is denied. This action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Cho for all remaining pre-trial matters, including settlement discussions if appropriate. The Clerk of Court is respectfully di rected to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at Shawangunk Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 750, Wallkill, New York 12589-0750, where he is currently incarcerated, and to update the docket sheet to reflect this new address. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/30/2022. (Caspari, Alexander)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, defendant Officer Rashan LaCoste's motion for summary judgment is denied with leave to renew. Defendant shall serve his motion for summary judgment, including a proper Rule 56.1 Statement a nd the notice required by Local Civil Rule 56.2, on plaintiff within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from his receipt of defendants motion in which to mail a response to the New York City Department of Law. Defendant shall have 15 days from his receipt of plaintiffs response in which to serve a reply on plaintiff, to electronically file a copy of the fully briefed motion with the Court, and to mail courtesy a courtesy copy of all motion papers to chambers. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Chief Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 03/31/2020. (Taronji, Robert)
December 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 27 Motion to Dismiss. All Plaintiff's claims except his malicious prosecution claims against Lawrence and Lacoste are hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims aris ing from his arrest and incarceration are untimely, his claims against Hynes and Albanese are barred by prosecutorial immunity, and his allegations as to the City, Hynes, Kelly, and Bloomberg are also too conclusory to state a claim. The malicious prosecution claims against Lawrence and Lacoste will proceed before Magistrate Judge Reyes for discovery as needed. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 12/7/2016. C/M (Barrett, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paige-Bey v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darren Albanese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Bloomberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District Attorney Charles J. Hynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Rashan LaCoste
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officer David Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zaire Paige-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?