Kardovich v. Pfizer, Inc.

Kardovich v. Pfizer, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Matt Kardovich
Defendant:	Pfizer, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv07378
Filed:	December 27, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2016	Filing 31 JUDGMENT in favor of Pfizer, Inc. against Chui Lila, Cindy Chang, Matt Kardovich. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/31/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
March 31, 2015	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17) is granted, and the Amended Class Action Complaint is hereby dismissed. Should plaintiffs seek to amend, they shall do so by formal motion, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, setting forth the legal bases as to why leave should be granted, and including a Proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint captioned as such. Defendant shall respond to such motion within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Any reply shall be made within fourteen (14) days of receipt of defendant's opposition. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/31/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2016

Filing 31 JUDGMENT in favor of Pfizer, Inc. against Chui Lila, Cindy Chang, Matt Kardovich. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/31/2016. (Taronji, Robert)

March 31, 2015

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 17) is granted, and the Amended Class Action Complaint is hereby dismissed. Should plaintiffs seek to amend, they shall do so by formal motion, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, setting forth the legal bases as to why leave should be granted, and including a Proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint captioned as such. Defendant shall respond to such motion within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Any reply shall be made within fourteen (14) days of receipt of defendant's opposition. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/31/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kardovich v. Pfizer, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matt Kardovich
Represented By:	Michael Robert Reese
Represented By:	Kim Richman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?