Peters v. USA
Petitioner: Annette Peters
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2013mc00103
Filed: February 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Joan M. Azrack
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying 1 Motion to Expunge. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the petitioner's motion to expunge her arrest record is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon pro se petitioner. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/27/2013. (Minarcik, Michelle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: John David Buretta
Represented By: David C Pitluck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Annette Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?