Nguyen v. Ridgewood Savings Bank et al
| Thomas Nguyen |
| Peter Boger and Ridgewood Savings Bank |
| 1:2014cv01058 |
| February 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court grants Defendants' 37 motions to dismiss, with prejudice, all of Plaintiff's federal claims and dismisses, without prejudice, Plaintiff's state law claim. The Court denies Plaintiff's request for default judgments. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these cases. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 5/15/2015. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety for failure to state a clai m. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint to correct any of the identified deficiencies as to his Fair Credit Reporting Act claim. Defendants' 21 letter request for a supplemental briefing schedule is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/17/2014. (Krause, Aimee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
