Peters et al v. Fervent Electrical Corp. et al
| Garfield McDonald and Brian Peters |
| Rucklin Drummond, Fervent Electrical Corp., Roman Kuczynski and R & A Renovations Corp. |
| 1:2014cv01804 |
| March 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying without prejudice 55 Motion for Contempt. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 7/5/2016. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
47
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 1/25/16. Appearances by B. Pelton, T. Graham for plaintiffs; P. Kutil for defendants. Discussion held and rulings made on the record granting 45 plaintiffs' request f or a ruling that the opt-in plaintiffs have asserted claims in this lawsuit to the extent discussed in the attached order. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended or supplemental complaint by 1/28/16. If plaintiffs choose to file an amended complaint, they must send counsel for defendant a "redlined" version of the amended complaint. Fact discovery is extended to 3/31/16. Next conference scheduled for 4/5/16 at 12:00 p.m. (Tape #FTR/C 10:01-10:10) (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 8/29/2014. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
