Centeno v. 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Plaintiff: Blanca Centeno
Defendant: 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Counter Claimant: 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Counter Defendant: Blanca Centeno
Case Number: 1:2014cv01916
Filed: March 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, upon due consideration and review, the objections to the detailed, thorough and very well reasoned Report and Recommendation (" R & R") issued by the Hon. Lois Bloom, U.S.M.J., on February 1, 2017, are overruled and the R&R is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (i) Defendant's Motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff's clai ms for breach of contract and for claims arising under the FMLA and NYSHRL are dismissed, and (ii) Plaintiff's Cross-Motion is granted to the extent that J.K. Management is deemed a proper party to this action, J.K. Management and 75 Lenox are a single employer, and Defendants qualify as an "employer" under Title VII and ADEA. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), the Clerk of the Court is directed to correct the docket sheet to reflect J.K. Management as a party in this action. J.K. Management shall file its answer to the Amended Complaint within 14 days of entry of this Memorandum & Order. The parties are ordered to contact Magistrate Judge Bloom's chambers within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum & Order to schedule a settlement conference. If settlement discussions are unsuccessful, within thirty (30) days of the final settlement conference, the parties shall submit for the district judge's approval their Joint Pretrial Order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/31/2017. (Irizarry, Dora)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Centeno v. 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Represented By: Howard Poch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 75 Lenox Realty LLC
Represented By: Howard Poch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Blanca Centeno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blanca Centeno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?