Sheehan v. Powers et al
| Barbara Sheehan |
| Williams Powers and The Attorney General of the State of New York |
| 1:2014cv02898 |
| May 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Report and Recommendation issued on October 17, 2017, by the Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak, Chief U.S.M.J., is adopted in its entire ty. Accordingly, the petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied in its entirety. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability as she fails to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); See also, Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F. 3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See, Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/19/2021. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
