Cortes v. City of New York et al
| Gonzalo Cortes |
| City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10 and "John" Smith |
| 1:2014cv03014 |
| May 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order, the Court's February 20, 2019 decision is VACATED to the extent it granted Defendants Cappucia, Ryan, Schulz, and Smith summary judgment on Plaintiff's cl aim for excessive force. Discovery is reopened for the limited purpose of identifying the officer who escorted Plaintiff toward the bathroom, which may be completed through either deposition or written interrogatories. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1), (4). Within 30 days of the date of this order, the parties shall file a joint letter certifying that this supplemental discovery is complete, informing the Court whether there is a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the identity of the afor ementioned officer, and identifying the bases (with citations to admissible evidence) for any such dispute. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 10/30/2019. VACATED pursuant to 113 Order of Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall. This entry has been modified on [10/30/2019] to indicate order 90 has been vacated.(Valderrama, Freddie).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
