Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
| Dollar Phone Access, Inc. |
| AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and The Southern New England Telephone Company |
| 1:2014cv03240 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons stated herein, Magistrate Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendation dated December 22, 2014, is adopted in its entirety. Defendants' motion to transfer this action to the No rthern District of Texas is granted. It is further ordered that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied as moot, and Plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery is denied. AT&T Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied without prejudice. Defendants may renew their motion in the transferee court. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 1/29/2015. (Barrett, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
