Maldonado v. Arcadia Business Corporation et al
| Jose Maldonado |
| Academic Stone Inc., Academic Stone Setters, Inc., Arcadia Business Corporation, James Donaghy, Josephine O'Grady and Petrillo Stone Corporation |
| 1:2014cv04129 |
| July 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE 26 Motion to Certify FLSA Collective Action. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, plaintiff's motion for conditional certification of an FLSA collective action, and for court-authorized notice, is granted. Plaintiff's counsel shall modify the notice in accordance with this order and shall electronically file the revised notice within fourteen (14) days. The Academic defendants shall produce a list of the names, addresses, email addr esses, and telephone numbers of potential class members to plaintiffs counsel by the same date. Plaintiff's counsel shall mail the revised notice to all potential plaintiffs no later than ten (10) days following defendants' disclosure of the contact information. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 4/27/2015. (Marino, Janine) See attached M&O for details.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
