Chiarelli v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
||Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and Nissan North America, Inc.
||July 16, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Nicholas G. Garaufis
||Viktor V. Pohorelsky
|Nature of Suit:
||Contract Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Notice of Removal
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 12, 2017
MEMORANDUM & ORDER, Because Defendant failed to file the required Rule 56.1 Statement, Defendant's Motion (Dkt. 40) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should Defendant decide to re-file its Motion with a Rule 56.1 Statement, it must first obtain a c ertification from Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo that fact discovery is complete. The court expects that any renewed motion filed by Defendant will comply with the Local Rules and the court's Individual Rules, including the page limits prescribed therein. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to amend the case caption to reflect the fact that Todd Maszon and Chris Santimauro have been removed as putative classrepresentatives in this action. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/7/2017. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|September 25, 2015
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Nissan's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All claims asserted in the Amended Complaint are dismissed except Plaintiffs' omissions-based theory under the GBL, the FDUTPA, and the MCPA, and Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim. Plaintiffs are directed to file a letter within fourteen ( 14) days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order, setting forth whether they (a) intend to amend only their mi srepresentations-based theory under the GBL, the FDUTP A, and the MCP A, see supra nn.12, 17, 19; (b) intend to amend their misrepresentations-based theory under the GBL, the FDUTP A, and the MCP A, and also seek leave to file a motion for le ave to amend any other claims dismissed in this Memorandum and Order for which the court has not granted leave to amend; or ( c) do not intend to file a further amended complaint. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/25/2015. (Lee, Tiffeny)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?