Axginc Corporation v. Plaza Automall, Ltd.
Axginc Corporation |
Plaza Automall, Ltd. |
1:2014cv04648 |
August 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Allyne R. Ross |
Vera M. Scanlon |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This order adopts Judge Scanlon's 124 Sua Sponte Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Plaintiff's 117 motion for summary relief is denied. Plaintiff's alternative motion, to the e xtent it seeks a hearing on the disputed fact issues pertaining to (1) whether and, if so, to what extent defendant has an interest in the funds that plaintiff seeks to reach, and (2) whether plaintiff's rights to the funds are superior to those of respondents' rights, is granted. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 5/19/2022. (Willingham, Alexandra) |
Filing 110 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: adopting 109 SUA SPONTE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in Judge Scanlon's 109 SUA SPONTE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, I deny plaintiff's motion, but I grant p laintiff leave to renew its motion within fifteen (15) days, on or before April 1, 2021. I stay vacatur of the restraining notices served against defendant and respondents until either (1) plaintiff's time to renew its motion has expired, in the event that plaintiff does not renew, or (2) plaintiff's renewed motion is decided, in the event that plaintiff does renew. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 3/17/2021. (Karr, Jacob) |
Filing 93 ORDER as to 84 85 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, filed by plaintiff: Judge Scanlon's decision is affirmed for the reasons stated in the attached opinion. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 10/2/2018. (Zimmer, Allison) |
Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS with one minor exception. Plaintiff's motion for damages 62 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is awarded damages of $2,609,337.99, plus $762.60 per day from May 27, 2017, through the date of entry of judgment, against defendant. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 11/9/2017. (Wasserman, Matthew) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Axginc Corporation v. Plaza Automall, Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Axginc Corporation | |
Represented By: | Christina Heather Bost Seaton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Plaza Automall, Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Bret I. Herman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.