Lilakos et al v. New York City et al
| C.L., Louis Lilakos, Tiffany Lilakos and Nick Pritzakis |
| John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, Derek Lee, Kathleen McGee, NYC Department of Buildings, NYC Mayor's Office of Special Enforcement, New York City and Vladimr Pugach |
| 1:2014cv05288 |
| September 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed and adopts in its entirety Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom's Report & Recommendation ("R&R") 154 , recommending that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary jud gment 134 . Plaintiff has failed to raise any objection 157 that warrants rejection or modification of the R&R, with which the Court concurs. The Court rejects Plaintiff's objections, adopts in full Judge Bloom's R&R, and grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants, as recommended by Judge Bloom. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and terminate this action. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 11/29/2018. (Nadig, Alok)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed and adopts in its entirety 117 Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom's Report & Recommendation, recommending that the Court grant Defendants' motion 79 to partially dismiss Plainti ffs' Second Amended Complaint 64 . Plaintiffs have failed to raise any objection that warrants rejection or modification of the R&R, with which the Court concurs. The Court overrules Plaintiffs' objections, adopts in full Judge Bloom's R&R, and dismisses Plaintiffs' class-of-one claim and Christopher Lilakos's due process claims, as recommended by Judge Bloom. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/5/2018. (Rediker, Ezekiel)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons in the attached, the Court denies both parties' motions for reconsideration. Plaintiff Louis Lilakos has thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint that names the officers alle gedly involved in his excessive force claim, supplements his equal protection class-of-one allegations, and adds Christopher Lilakos as a plaintiff, to the extent he is asserting claims that have not previously been dismissed. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 11/15/2016. (Merin, Eric)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth in the attached, the Court adopts, in its entirety, Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendations, which recommends granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6). Accordingly, Plaintiffs' State-law claims will proceed, as will Plaintiff Louis Lilakos's due process, excessive force, and malicious prosecution claims. Moreover, Plaintiff Louis Lilakos has thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to amend the Amended Complaint to name the officers allegedly involved in his excessive force claim and supplement his equal protection class-of-one allegations. If after amendment, Defendants deem Plaintiff Louis Lilakos's class-of-one allegations insufficient, they shall file a letter in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, requesting a pre-motion conference in anticipation of a motion to dismiss. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/30/2016. (Merin, Eric)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
