Soliman v. Maersk Line, Limited
Plaintiff: Mohammed Soliman
Defendant: Maersk Line, Limited
Case Number: 1:2014cv05951
Filed: October 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 Jones Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Mohammed Soliman against Defendant Maersk Line, Ltd. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds Maersk liable for Jones Act Negligence and awards Mohammed Soliman damages in the amount of $638,603. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 1/26/2017. (Naidich, Zachary)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soliman v. Maersk Line, Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maersk Line, Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammed Soliman
Represented By: Ralph J. Mellusi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?