Siino v. NYC Human Resources Administration/Department of Social Services et al
| Carolyn Jane Siino |
| City of New York, Crown House Realty Co., LLC, Guardian Services, Inc., NYC Department of Homeless Services, NYC Human Resources Administration/Department of Social Services and New York Foundation for Senior Citizens |
| 1:2014cv07217 |
| December 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Plaintiff's 91 third motion for reconsideration and her 93 motion to supplement her motion for reconsideration. If Plaintiff believes she ha s newly ripe claims, she may contact the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project of the City Bar Justice Center at 212-382-4729 for limited-scope legal assistance in determining how to proceed. As this is Plaintiff's third motion for reconsider ation of the same issues, Plaintiff is advised that additional, similar motions may result in a bar against further filings in this case without prior approval of the Court. See, e.g., Huminski v. Connecticut, No. 14-CV-1390, 2015 WL 1825966, at *3 (D. Conn. Apr. 22, 2015) (warning pro se plaintiff that "should he nonetheless continue to file frivolous motions despite this [c]ourt's repeated warnings, the [c]ourt [will] enjoin [him] from submitting any further filings related to the e vents described in his complaint or the [c]ourt's rulings regarding his complaint (other than a notice of appeal) in the District of Connecticut without this [c]ourts prior approval"); see also Sassower v. Sansverie, 885 F.2d 9, 11 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam) ("We write... to give fair warning to appellant that if he continues to abuse the judicial process by the instigation of frivolous appeals, an injunction will issue directing the Clerk of this Court to refuse to accept for fi ling any submissions from him, unless he has first obtained leave of the [c]ourt to file such papers."); Martin-Trigona v. Lavien (In re Martin-Trigona), 737 F.2d 1254, 1261 (2d Cir. 1984) (per curiam) ("Federal courts have both the inherent power and the constitutional obligation to protect their jurisdiction from conduct which impairs their ability to carry out Article III functions."). Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/21/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Plaintiff's second motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at the address of record. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 6/2/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court grants Defendant's motion for summary judgment and denies Plaintiff's motion to amend the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Carolyn Jane Siino, P.O. Box 170050, Ozone Park, NY 11417, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/14/2020. (Valentin, Winnethka)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's 15 motion to reconsider the 7/9/2015 dismissal of the claims asserted in the Amended Complaint. The Court also dismisses Plaintiff's FHA claims asserting discrimination based on f amily status or religion, considered for the first time. The Court grants Plaintiff's 15 request to reopen the case and grants Plaintiff 120 days' leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, with respect to her due process or statutory claims based on alleged procedural deprivations related to her Medicaid benefits and her disability discrimination claims. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 2/19/2016. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM & ORDER [DISMISSING CASE]: Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii). As the Court has dismissed all federal claims, the Court declines to exercise suppleme ntal jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 7/9/2015. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff's claims are dismissed. Plaintiff is gran ted 30 days from the date of this order to replead her Complaint. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 4/21/2015. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER re 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the purposes of this order, Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. To the extent Plaintiff must be represented by her Guardian in this action, copy of this Order shall be sent to Plaintiff and the organization which she alleges to be her guardian, New York Foundation for Senior Citizens, Guardian Services, 11 Park Place, 14th Floor, New York NY 10007-2801. Unless the Guardian appears on Plaintiff's behalf within thirty (30) days, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 2/20/2015. (Krause, Aimee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
