Rao et al v. The City of New York et al
| Poornima Kishor, Bhavna Kumar, Tejas Kumar and Kishor Kumar Rao |
| Detectives "John Doe" and "Jane Doe", Police Officer Yisel Cabrera, LT. Michael Gaudio, Detective Riso, The City of New York, The New York City Police Department and Detective Kevin Warmhold |
| 1:2014cv07422 |
| December 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, defendants' 167 motion for sanctions is denied. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/26/2023. (SDC)
|
|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court has resolved several of the outstanding evidentiary disputes as explained in the attached memorandum. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 1/17/2023. (SDC)
|
|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons explained in the attached memorandum, defendants' motion at 104 and 127 to prohibit plaintiff from seeking damages stemming from his arrest is denied. Plaintiff will be permitted to introduce evidence regarding his September 2013 arrest and detention to show damages for malicious abuse of process. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 12/23/2022. (SDC)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order,the defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 64) is granted in part and de nied in part. Rao's false arrest claim as to all defendants is dismissed. Rao's remaining claims are: (1) abuse of process as to defendant Warmhold only; (2) excessive force, assault and battery and failure to intervene against defendants Warmhold, Gridley and Cabrera. This case is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Bloom for all remaining pre-trial proceedings. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/29/2018. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R (Doc. No. 45) for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to amend (Doc. No. 44) is denied. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/20/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
