Nguyen et al v. Bush et al
| Thomas Nguyen and Tiffany Nguyen |
| Michael R. Bloomberg, George W. Bush, Elaine Chao, China Airlines and Mr. Hung-Hsiang Sun |
| Port Authority of New York/New Jersey |
| 1:2015cv00641 |
| February 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 10 Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Plaintiffs' motion to vacate the Court's May 1, 2015 judgment or to reconsider the May 1, 2015 Decision dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/16/2016. (Rolle, Drew)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiffs' requests to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 are granted solely for the purpose of this Order. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 5/1/2015. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiffs. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
