Threeline Imports, Inc. v. Vernikov et al
| Threeline Imports, Inc. |
| Interpage International Inc., John Does 1-5, Grigoriy Vernikov and XYZ Companies |
| 1:2015cv02333 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: I find that the plaintiff did not prove at trial that it had valid rights to the chicken-and-egg logo, and therefore has not proved its Lanham Act infringement and counterfeiting claims against the defendants. On the other hand , I find that the defendants have established common law rights in the chicken-and-egg logo, and have shown that the plaintiff is liable to them for Lanham Act trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false designation of origin, as well as co mmon law unfair competition and unjust enrichment. The Court will consider damages on these claims--including requests for attorney's fees--in the next phase of these proceedings. Further, as a result of these findings, the May 21, 2015 preliminary injunction is dissolved. To discuss the damages phase of this case, the parties are to appear at a status conference before this Court on March 29, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 3/3/2017. (Greene, Donna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
