Aguilar et al v. Ham N Eggery Deli Inc. et al
Armando Aguilar and Benito Cruz Torres |
Ham N Eggery Deli Inc., Mike Hunt and Kosfas Kaloudis |
1:2015cv02781 |
May 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Marilyn D. Go |
Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 ORDER denying 98 Motion for New Trial; denying 102 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the court denies defendants' motions for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, an d grants plaintiffs' 99 motion (which was not correctly docketed as a motion event) for liquidated damages, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees. Specifically, the court orders that plaintiffs are entitled to the following: (1) compensatory minimum wage damages of $4,400 to Aguilar and $4,535 to Torres; (2) compensatory overtime damages of $18,084.38 to Aguilar and $13,843.63 to Torres; (3) liquidated damages of $7,443.13 to Aguilar and $4,594.66 to Torres; and (4) prejudgment interest of $14,873.42 to Aguilar and $16,127.15 to Torres. The parties are directed to meet, confer, and jointly propose a briefing schedule regarding attorneys fees by October 1, 2019. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this order. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/5/2019. (Spriggs, Steven) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.