Hill v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. et al
| Tonya Hill |
| DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and Doonan, Graves and Langoria, LLC |
| 1:2015cv03083 |
| May 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motions are granted to the extent set forth herein; plaintiff's FDCPA and RESPA claims (first, second and fourth claims for relief) are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice pursu ant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim for a relief; and plaintiff's remaining state law claim (third claim for relief) is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 10/5/2016. (Tirado, Chelsea)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, For the foregoing reasons, the Clerk of Court is directed to take all steps necessary to transfer the docket in this case to the Central Islip courthouse and effect its reassignment by random selection. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 5/17/2016) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
