Castillo et al v. G&M Realty L.P. et al
| Maria Castillo, James Cochran, Luis Gomez, Bienbenido Guerra, Richard Miller, Kai Niederhausen, Carlo Nieva, Rodney Rodriguez and Kenji Takabayashi |
| 22-50 Jackson Avenue Owners, L.P., 22-52 Jackson Avenue LLC, ACD Citiview Buildings, LLC, G&M Realty L.P. and Gerald Wolkoff |
| 1:2015cv03230 |
| June 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Frederic Block |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER denying, without prejudice, 93 Motion for Bond. Defendants are directed to promptly disclose to plaintiffs' counsel the financial information with which they offered to furnish the Court. The parties shall further confer in good faith to resolve this dispute. If they are unable to reach a resolution, either side may seek the Court's approval of a particularized proposed form of security; the parties' submissions should be supported by evidentiary (financial) material, which may be filed under seal, with access limited to case participants. See attached for discussion. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/22/2018. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM and ORDER: Defendants motions 83 are denied in their entirety. See attached Memorandum and Order for details. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 6/13/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: While defendants proposed bond covers only the amount of judgment, the Court is satisfied that defendants, well-financed real estate companies and their wealthy owner, will be fiscally able to pay interest and costs after the appellate process ends. Therefore, the proposed bond is approved, and enforcement of judgment is stayed pending appeal. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 3/15/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM and ORDER: Defendants motion 74 seeking a stay is granted in part and denied in part. In the exercise of its discretion, the Court grants defendants a seven-day extension of the current stay until March 14, 2018. This will afford defenda nts a total of 21 days from judgment to secure a supersedeas bond or, alternatively, an appropriate letter of credit. Regardless of which, if any, is presented to the Court, it will rule on its adequacy when submitted. Defendants alternative motion to stay pending post- trial motions is denied as premature, as no such motions have been filed. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 3/6/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION: This is the Court's written decision in what has commonly become know as the 5Pointz litigation. The Court finds in favor of the plaintiffs in the amounts determined in this decision. Judgement will be entered shortly. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 2/12/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
|
|
Filing
32
memorandum AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order, the defendants motion for summary judgment 29 is GRANTED as to the plaintiffs claims for conversion, property damage, and IIED, but DENIED as to the plaintiffs VA RA claim, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the defendants counterclaim. Accordingly, the matter shall proceed to trial on the VARA claim issue. In addition, as the plaintiffs counsel was unable to specify the number of artwork at issue, counsel is directed to submit a final list to the defendants and the Court on or before May 1, 2017. Depending on the length of the list, the Court reserves judgment as to whether the list is short enough to be handled by a single jury. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 3/31/2017. (Innelli, Michael)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
