Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:	United Parcel Service, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2015cv04141
Filed:	July 15, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Margo K. Brodie
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl L. Pollak
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2018	Filing 80 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has reviewed the unopposed R&R and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court denies Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Claimants Hakim, Hamlet, Shah and Gibson. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/20/2018. (McKenzie, Lindsay)
June 29, 2017	Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts Judge Pollak's recommendations as to the fourth, fifth, twelfth, fifteenth and twenty-second affirmative defenses, except as to the unnamed claimants in the twenty-second affirmative defense, and declines to adopt Judge Pollak's recommendations as to the sixth and twenty-third affirmative defenses. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant' ;s fourth, sixth, fifteenth, and twenty-third affirmative defenses and grants Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's twenty-second affirmative defense except as to the unnamed claimants. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion to strike the fifth and twelfth affirmative defenses. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 6/29/2017. (Haji, Sara)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2018

Filing 80 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has reviewed the unopposed R&R and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court denies Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Claimants Hakim, Hamlet, Shah and Gibson. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/20/2018. (McKenzie, Lindsay)

June 29, 2017

Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts Judge Pollak's recommendations as to the fourth, fifth, twelfth, fifteenth and twenty-second affirmative defenses, except as to the unnamed claimants in the twenty-second affirmative defense, and declines to adopt Judge Pollak's recommendations as to the sixth and twenty-third affirmative defenses. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant' ;s fourth, sixth, fifteenth, and twenty-third affirmative defenses and grants Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's twenty-second affirmative defense except as to the unnamed claimants. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion to strike the fifth and twelfth affirmative defenses. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 6/29/2017. (Haji, Sara)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By:	Nora E. Curtin
Represented By:	Elizabeth Fox-Solomon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?