Miller v. United States of America
| Maureen Miller |
| United States of America |
| 1:2015cv04262 |
| July 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING MOTION - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, in light of plaintiff's pro se status, her emergency motion for a hearing en banc before all district court judges in the United States, which relief is nonexistent, is deemed a motion for reconsideration of this Court's denial of reconsideration of its decision dismissing this action. See, Dkt. Entry No. 17. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Court cer tifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See, Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). This case was closed previously by Court order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 6/30/2021. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal f rom this Summary Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se plaintiff. This case previously was closed by court order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/1/2016. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Recusal; denying 7 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 8 Motion for More Definite Statement; finding as moot 9 Motion for Emergency Accommodation; finding as moot 10 Motion to Compel; granting 2 Mo tion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN Memorandum and Order, pro se plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted solely for purposes of this Order. Pla intiff's motion for recusal is denied, and Plaintiff's motions to amend the docket sheet and for emergency relief are denied as moot. Plaintiff's additional motions for "Emergency Accommodation" [Docket Entry #9] and Motion to Compel a decision on her requests are denied as moot in light of the dismissal of this Complaint.The Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice, as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U .S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum and Order to pro se plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/20/2015. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maureen Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
