National Income Life Insurance Company et al v. Ramkarran et al
| United American Insurance Company and National Income Life Insurance Company |
| Rakesh Ramkarran and Harrynarine Ramoutar |
| 1:2015cv04655 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1127 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 consent permanent injunction and judgment) (Rocco, Christine) |
Filing 11
CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of National Income Life Insurance Company and United American Insurance Company against Harrynarine Ramoutar and Rakesh Ramkarran Document #9 is So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 2/9/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
|
| Filing 10 Letter Explaining Settlement of Matter and Requesting That Proposed Consent Judgment Be So-Ordered by National Income Life Insurance Company, United American Insurance Company (Medley, Kyle) |
| Filing 9 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Proposed Consent Permanent Injunction and Judgment Against Defendants by National Income Life Insurance Company, United American Insurance Company (Medley, Kyle) |
| Filing 8 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by National Income Life Insurance Company, United American Insurance Company (Medley, Kyle) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by National Income Life Insurance Company, United American Insurance Company. Harrynarine Ramoutar served on 8/12/2015, answer due 9/2/2015. (Medley, Kyle) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by National Income Life Insurance Company, United American Insurance Company. Rakesh Ramkarran served on 8/14/2015, answer due 9/4/2015. (Medley, Kyle) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link:http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Levin on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Levin, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Ramoutar summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-7939037 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by National Income Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Defendant Ramkarran, #3 Proposed Summons Defendant Ramoutar) (Medley, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
