Pierre v. Human Rights Division
| Jean Gespere Pierre |
| Human Rights Division |
| 1:2015cv04881 |
| August 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter dated 11/18/2016 to Judge Brodie from John Gespere Pierre regarding advice on case. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
| Filing 8 MANDATE of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jean Gespere Pierre. Appellant, pro se, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Issued as Mandate: 10/11/16 (McGee, Mary Ann) |
| Electronic Index to Record on Appeal sent to US Court of Appeals. #7 Notice of Appeal, Documents are available via Pacer. For docket entries without a hyperlink or for documents under seal, contact the court and we'll arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (McGee, Mary Ann) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Clerk's Judgment,, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order Dismissing Case, by Jean Gespere Pierre. No fee paid. IFP denied for purposes of appeal. Please Note: Pursuant to Judge Brodie's Order of 4/20/16, document #6 Letter, is being construed as a Notice of Appeal. (McGee, Mary Ann) |
ORDER construing #6 Plaintiff's letter as a notice of appeal. The Clerk is directed to treat Plaintiff's letter as a notice of appeal of #4 decision and #5 judgment. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/20/2016. (Haji, Sara)
|
| Filing 6 Letter dated April 18, 2016 from Jean-G Pierre to Judge Brodie, requesting that plaintiff's name be corrected on the docket. (Piper, Francine) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; that the Complaint is dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) any appeal from the Court's Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Clerk of Court, on 4/11/2016. (Copy of this Judgment and the attached appeals packet sent to pro se Plaintiff via first class mail.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, because the Court has no jurisdiction to hear challenges to determinations made by the New York State Division of Human Rights in adjudicating complaints, the Complaint is dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 4/8/2016. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven L Tiscione. Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom no longer assigned to the case.Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Motions referred to Steven L Tiscione. (Mahoney, Brenna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link:http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jean Gespere Pierre. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Human Rights Division, filed by Jean Gespere Pierre. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pierre v. Human Rights Division | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jean Gespere Pierre | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Human Rights Division | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
