Abramowitz v. D&A Services, LLC
Leonard Abramowitz |
D&A Services, LLC and Dynia & Associates, LLC |
1:2015cv04889 |
August 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
James Orenstein |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: re #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Leonard Abramowitz -- In light of the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal, all scheduled conferences before me are cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 1/25/2016. (Smerd, Jocelyn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Leonard Abramowitz (Fishbein, Adam) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: re #5 Status Report filed by Leonard Abramowitz -- A telephone conference will be held on January 26, 2016, at 12:30 p.m. If a stipulation of dismissal is filed by January 22, 2016, I will cancel the conference; otherwise, counsel for the plaintiff shall initiate the call and conference in chambers when all parties are on the line. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 12/28/2015. (Smerd, Jocelyn) |
Filing 5 STATUS REPORT by Leonard Abramowitz (Fishbein, Adam) |
ORDER --- A review of the docket indicates that the plaintiff has not filed proof of timely service of the Summons and Complaint as required on defendant D&A Services, LLC. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l), (m). No later than December 29, 2015, the plaintiff must either file proof of timely service on the docket or file a motion requesting an extension of the time to effect service for good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Failure to comply will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), 41 (b). Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 12/22/2015. (Guy, Alicia) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link:http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to D&A Services, LLC. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our ##website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D&A Services, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-7966049 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Leonard Abramowitz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fishbein, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.