Assets Recovery 23, LLC v. Gasper et al
Assets Recovery 23, LLC |
John Doe "1" through "10", Kahlil Gasper, Marlena Gasper and New York City Environmental Control Board |
1:2015cv05049 |
August 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Raymond J. Dearie |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
12 U.S.C. ยง 191 Bank Foreclosure |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having reviewed the objections to Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendation of September 11, 2018, the Court adopts the Recommendation and pants Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint . I find no basis to disturb Magistrate Judge Pollak's comprehensive analysis or credibility assessment regarding the attempted service of process upon non-party Almitra Gasper or Plaintiff Marlena Gasper. SO Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 11/7/2018. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed and considered defendants' objections, I find them meritless, and adopt the Report and its recommendations without limitation or qualification. I ask Magistrate JudgePollak to conduct a hearing on the validity of service as to defendant Marlena Gasper at the Court's convenience and invite further recommendation when appropriate fact-finding is completed. SO Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 8/21/2017. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.