U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AZ Metro Distributors LLC
| U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| AZ Metro Distributors LLC |
| 1:2015cv05370 |
| September 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: plaintiffs motion and defendants motion are granted in part and denied in part: Defendants motion for judgement as a matter of law regarding plaintiffs prima facie case of harassment is denied. Defendants motion for judg ment as a matter of law is granted with respect to mitigation, and defendant is entitled to a new trial on the issue of damages,provided that plaintiff declines remittitur of $228,204.64 from the $250,288.96 amount awarded by the jury to Fe rnandez (for an award of $22,084.32 in back pay, doubled to $44,168.64 with liquidated damages) and a remittitur of $107,392.81 from the $207,704.78 amount awarded by the jury to Roberts (for an award of $100,331.97 in back p ay, doubled to $200,663.94 with liquidated damages). Defendants motion for a new trial due to trial error is denied. Plaintiffs motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issues of front pay and reinstatement is denied. Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief is granted in part, as specified in this order. A new trial will be ordered unless plaintiff agrees to accept remittitur no later than 30 days from the docket entry of this Order, in writing, filed electronically with the Court and served on defendants. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/16/2020. (Almonte, Giselle)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motions in Limine 160 ; denying Plaintiff's motions in limine 150 , 151 , 156 , 158 ; denying as moot motion in limine 152 ; granting motions in limine 153 , 154 , 157 ; deferring ruling on motion in limine 155 , all for the reasons set forth herein. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/9/2019. (Craft, Rachel)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, In line with the foregoing, Judge Kuo's R&R is adopted as modified in this Order. The fourth, seventh and eighth affirmative defenses are ordered stricken, without prejudice to deft's right to seek any appropriate attorney's fees, costs or sanctions should it become the prevailing party. Additionally, the third, fifth and sixth affirmative defenses are ordered stricken. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/09/2017) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
|
Filing
104
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Motion Hearing held on April 13, 2017 and ORDER granting 94 Motion to Compel Further 30(b)(6) Depositions of EEOC, granting 95 Motion to Compel Production of Documents for I n Camera Review, and deferring ruling on 97 Motion for Protective Order or to Quash Subpoenas. Attorneys Kirsten Peters and Jeffrey Burstein appeared for Plaintiff. Attorney Christopher Keenan appeared for Defendant. Detailed minutes of the motion hearing are annexed. A telephone conference is scheduled for June 1, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. (Tape #10:19-12:30.) (Syed, Sofie)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Finding that the order of Magistrate Judge Kuo authorizing limited depositions of EEOC officials is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, that order is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/06/2016) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AZ Metro Distributors LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AZ Metro Distributors LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Nora E. Curtin |
| Represented By: | Kirsten J. Peters |
| Represented By: | Robert D. Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
