Blount v. City Of New York et al
| Vernail Blount |
| Detective Peter Bohringer, City Of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 25, Detective Michael Kelly, Police Officer Aaron Lohman and Police Officer Erik Nelson |
| 1:2015cv05599 |
| September 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| James Orenstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, 75 Defendants' motions in limine are granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion in limine to permit the admission of evidence of, or reference to, Plaintiff's stage name at trial is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claims is granted solely as to Plaintiff's sixth claim against Defendant Lohman based on the September 28, 2012 arrest. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/5/2019. (Knapp, Cody)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 57 is granted in part and denied in part. The parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Order by August 31, 2018. A pretrial conference will be scheduled thereafter. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/10/2018. (Hess, Alexandra)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
