BAT LLC v. TD Bank N.A. et al
| BAT LLC |
| ADT LLC and TD Bank N.A. |
| 1:2015cv05839 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth herein, BAT's objection (Doc. No. 164 ) is overruled. This case remains committed to Magistrate Judge Pollak for all pretrial discovery issues. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 1/31/2019. (Taronji, Robert)
|
|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 122 ; granting 123 ; finding as moot 129 ; granting 131 ; granting 133 . BAT's motion to compel is denied with the few exceptions noted by the Court. TD Bank's motion for a protective order with respect t o BAT's Second Requests for Admissions and May 4, 2018 Requests for Production is granted, as is Lydia Security Monitoring, Inc.'s motion for protective order regarding BAT's January 2018 and February 2018 requests for production. TD Bank lacks standing to move to quash BAT's subpoenas directed to third parties and its motion is therefore denied in that respect. Based on the apparent agreement of the parties, the Court finds BAT's motion to compel depositions to be moot, but directs the parties to confer on dates as set forth herein. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/30/2018. (Blase, Brendan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
