HVT, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
| HVT, Inc. |
| Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |
| 1:2015cv05867 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court adopts 101 Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon's report and recommendation. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/15/2023. (TD)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and grants in part the parties' proposed 69 and 70 remedies. The Court approves as sati sfying due process the following: (1) within five business days of a vehicle seizure, the Port Authority Police Department must send notice of the seizure to titled owners, registered owners and lienholders via certified mail; (2) the notice should i ndicate the right to a hearing; (3) the notice should explain the hearing process; and (4) the titled owner, registered owner or lienholder is responsible for paying the towing fee when a car must be seized and towed for safekeeping after the arrest of the driver. In addition, the Court directs the parties to submit, within forty-five days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, the additional information requested in a joint submission. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/26/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
77
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re the parties' draft proposals at 69 and 70 . For the reasons stated above, this Court respectfully recommends that the District Court grant in part the parties' proposed remedies, and requests that, within 45 days of the adoption of this report and recommendation, if it is adopted, the parties submit the additional information requested within in a joint submission. This Court thus respectfully recommends the District Court approve as satisfying due proc ess the following: (i) within five business days of a vehicle seizure, the PAPD must send notice of the seizure to titled owners, registered owners and lienholders via certified mail; (ii) the notice should indicate the right to a hearing; (iii) the notice should explain the hearing process; and (iv) the titled owner, registered owner or lienholder is responsible for paying the towing fee when a car must be seized and towed for safekeeping after the arrest of the driver. The Court will hold a hearing within 30 days of receipt of the joint submission. Objections to R&R due by 8/18/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 8/4/2021. (Scully, Nicole)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons stated herein, this Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs, and awards Plaintiff as against Defendant $190,001.00 in attorneys' fees and $548.68 in costs for a total award of $190,549.68. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/21/2018. (Pearce, Jessica)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has reviewed the unopposed R&R and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court grants in part and denies in part the parties&# 039; cross-motions. The Court orders Defendant to release Plaintiff's bond except as to the $80.00 towing fee, awards Plaintiff nominal damages in the amount of $1.00 against Defendant, and permits Plaintiff to move for compensatory da mages and attorneys' fees within sixty days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. The Court further directs the parties, within sixty days of this Memorandum and Order, to submit for the Court's review joint proposed revised regulations or procedures consistent with the R&R. If the parties cannot agree, they shall submit a joint letter detailing their differences. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/21/2018. (Stanford, Nia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HVT, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HVT, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Port Authority of New York and New Jersey | |
| Represented By: | Margaret M.T. Finucane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
